Emma :)
Member
Read This:
I see a lot of forum users (especially newgens) adapting their rating system to this thing called "Looksflation".
I don't know what the fuck happened but MTN is considered "above average" now and LTN is average, how did this come to that conclusion?
If you really think a 5/10 (MTN) is above average then I already know you are a newgen and low IQ because you don't seen to question the narrative that tiktokers when it comes to looksmaxxing are retarded. Looksflation doesnt change anything, if you are rating MTN nowadays you would be HTN or closer to CL at best. If you are rated LTN nowadays you were actually MTN before Looksflation.
But my main point is that Looksflation is not a real thing all because you are seeing "more" models on tiktok than anything.
What they forgot is that these models are still CL+, and CL+ is still considered extremely rare.
Yet they are getting rated MTN or HTN all because of "Looksflation" which is just an excuse to underrate people so they can feel more insecure about themselves.
Looksflation also doesnt make sense because the person who made it thought that the bell curve chart thingy (read below) correlates to tiktokers, but it was originally made for the human population.
Most humans are still average or slightly, some european populations being slightly or above, but most of them are average.
And yes you can argue that 4/10 is average because of third world countries, but you have to understand this.
4/10 is pretty rare on itself too, and if thats the case then every european would be 4/10 or 3/10.
Looksflation is not a real thing anyway, there are still average people around the world. All they did was make the looksflation scale based on how many gl people they saw on tiktok (which tiktok promotes heavily because it makes them money from it.)
If someone can send the bell chart in this thread then please do so.
(bump this)
I see a lot of forum users (especially newgens) adapting their rating system to this thing called "Looksflation".
I don't know what the fuck happened but MTN is considered "above average" now and LTN is average, how did this come to that conclusion?
If you really think a 5/10 (MTN) is above average then I already know you are a newgen and low IQ because you don't seen to question the narrative that tiktokers when it comes to looksmaxxing are retarded. Looksflation doesnt change anything, if you are rating MTN nowadays you would be HTN or closer to CL at best. If you are rated LTN nowadays you were actually MTN before Looksflation.
But my main point is that Looksflation is not a real thing all because you are seeing "more" models on tiktok than anything.
What they forgot is that these models are still CL+, and CL+ is still considered extremely rare.
Yet they are getting rated MTN or HTN all because of "Looksflation" which is just an excuse to underrate people so they can feel more insecure about themselves.
Looksflation also doesnt make sense because the person who made it thought that the bell curve chart thingy (read below) correlates to tiktokers, but it was originally made for the human population.
Most humans are still average or slightly, some european populations being slightly or above, but most of them are average.
And yes you can argue that 4/10 is average because of third world countries, but you have to understand this.
4/10 is pretty rare on itself too, and if thats the case then every european would be 4/10 or 3/10.
Looksflation is not a real thing anyway, there are still average people around the world. All they did was make the looksflation scale based on how many gl people they saw on tiktok (which tiktok promotes heavily because it makes them money from it.)
If someone can send the bell chart in this thread then please do so.
(bump this)
